Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Vignone

State v. Vignone

570 So. 2d 1112, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9132, 1990 WL 192313
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 1990
DocketNo. 90-312
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 570 So. 2d 1112 (State v. Vignone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vignone, 570 So. 2d 1112, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9132, 1990 WL 192313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress because it found that the confidential informant’s reliability had not been sufficiently established by the sheriff. We reverse. When an informant is not a confidential informant and gives his own independent affidavit in support of the warrant, it is not incumbent upon the police to establish his reliability. See State v. Robinson, 460 So.2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), cert. dismissed, 464 So.2d 555 (Fla.1985).

[1113]*1113REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Guertin
650 So. 2d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 So. 2d 1112, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9132, 1990 WL 192313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vignone-fladistctapp-1990.