State v. Vickers

943 N.E.2d 572, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1425
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 2011
Docket2011-0049
StatusPublished

This text of 943 N.E.2d 572 (State v. Vickers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vickers, 943 N.E.2d 572, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 10AP-318. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 N.E.2d 572, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vickers-ohio-2011.