State v. Vice

262 So. 3d 888
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 28, 2019
DocketNo. 2018-KK-1926
StatusPublished

This text of 262 So. 3d 888 (State v. Vice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vice, 262 So. 3d 888 (La. 2019).

Opinion

GENOVESE, J., would grant for reasons assigned by Justice Hughes.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

The judge and the prosecutor, as an officer of the court, have a duty to ensure that criminal defendants, even guilty ones, do not sit in jail after prosecution deadlines have lapsed, without notice or remedy due to the lack of notice. The defendant in this case should be afforded a bond hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 So. 3d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vice-la-2019.