State v. Vezia

503 P.3d 506, 317 Or. App. 654

• Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
• Decided: February 16, 2022
• Docket: A173844
• Status: Published

Opinion

Submitted January 7; conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded, otherwise affirmed February 16, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JEMITRIS CHANCE VEZIA, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR44219; A173844 503 P3d 506

Angel Lopez, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Emily P. Seltzer, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attor- ney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed. Cite as 317 Or App 654 (2022) 655

PER CURIAM Defendant was charged by indictment with stran- gulation (Count 1) and fourth-degree assault (Count 2). Defendant requested that the court instruct the jury that a guilty verdict must be unanimous, and the court declined to give that instruction. The jury returned a guilty verdict on Count 1 that was 11-1. It also returned a not guilty verdict on Count 2. The trial court entered a judgment of convic- tion and sentence on Count 1, and the acquittal on Count 2. Defendant assigns error to the conviction on a nonunani- mous jury verdict, under Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 583 (2020) (holding that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimous verdicts for convictions of serious crimes in state criminal cases). The state concedes that, in light of that decision, the jury’s nonunanimous ver- dict on Count 1 requires reversal and remand for a new trial. We agree and accept the concession. Conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.