State v. Verpent

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Verpent

65 A.3d 259, 213 N.J. 531

DecidedJanuary 16, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.3d 259 (State v. Verpent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Verpent, 65 A.3d 259, 213 N.J. 531 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in denying [532]*532defendant’s motion to suppress the results of the urine test; 2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain expert testimony that was allegedly beyond the scope of the expert’s qualifications; and 3) whether the trial court impermissibly allowed expert testimony on the ultimate issue of fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in denying [532]*532defendant’s motion to suppress the results of the urine test; 2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain expert testimony that was allegedly beyond the scope of the expert’s qualifications; and 3) whether the trial court impermissibly allowed expert testimony on the ultimate issue of fact.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.3d 259, 213 N.J. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-verpent-nj-2013.