State v. . Vermington

71 N.C. 264
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 71 N.C. 264 (State v. . Vermington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Vermington, 71 N.C. 264 (N.C. 1874).

Opinion

RodhaN, J.

This is an indictment for adulterous cohabitation, found at Spring Term, 1874, of Rowan Superior Court. At the same time the defendants moved to dismiss the proceedings, or as it must be understood, to quash the indictment for want of jurisdiction in the Court. The conduct charged is made an offence by Rev. Code, ch. 34, sec. 45, (Bat. Rev., eh. 32, sec. 46,) and being a misdemeanor as at common law, it was punishable by fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the Court. By an act ratified 16th February, 1874, (act 1873-74, ch. 176, sec. 3) the punishment was limited so that it could not exceed a fine of fifty dollars or imprisonment for one month. By section 13, jurisdiction of the offence was expressly given to a Justice of the Peace. This was perhaps unnecessary, as the Constitution, Art. IY, sec. 38, expressly gives to Justices exclusive criminal jurisdiction of all offences, the punishment of which cannot exceed that now limited for this offence. The Court acted rightly in dismissing the proceedings as it had no jurisdiction.

Pee Cueiam, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

S. v. . McAden
77 S.E. 298 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. McAden
162 N.C. 575 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. . Fesperman
13 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.C. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vermington-nc-1874.