State v. Verduzco
This text of 492 P.2d 1181 (State v. Verduzco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to State v. Nunez, 108 Ariz. 71, 492 P.2d 1178 (1972).
The cases against both Verduzco and Nunez arose out of the same factual setting. Both were charged with the robbery of one Victor Zavarella, a cab driver; both were identified at the scene and subsequently at a line-up.
Reference is herein made to the complete factual presentation as it appears in our opinion in Nunez.
[75]*75On October 2, 1970, the two cases were consolidated for the purposes of trial only. Upon a jury verdict finding defendants Verduzco and Nunez guilty as charged, defendants were separately sentenced. Judgment was entered upon the verdict and defendant Verduzco was sentenced to five years on probation on the condition, among others, that he be incarcerated for one year in the County Jail.
Since defendant Verduzco raises the identical questions on appeal as did defendant Nunez and since both appeals arise out of the same facts, we hold that our discussion of the issues in Nunez is dispositive of the questions raised here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 P.2d 1181, 108 Ariz. 74, 1972 Ariz. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-verduzco-ariz-1972.