State v. Verdin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Verdin

221 So. 2d 515, 253 La. 1076, 1969 La. LEXIS 2985

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 25, 1969

DocketNo. 49815

StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 2d 515 (State v. Verdin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Verdin, 221 So. 2d 515, 253 La. 1076, 1969 La. LEXIS 2985 (La. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

[1077]*1077The petition of the relator in the above •entitled and numbered case having been ■duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Baron B. Bourg, Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Terrebonne, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

[1077]*1077The petition of the relator in the above •entitled and numbered case having been ■duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Baron B. Bourg, Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Terrebonne, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 So. 2d 515, 253 La. 1076, 1969 La. LEXIS 2985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-verdin-la-1969.