State v. Veney

868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1425
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 20, 2007·No. 2007-0657·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295. Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2007-0656, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Veney, 868 N.E.2d 679, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2007).

868 N.E.2d 679 (State v. Veney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bedford v. McLeod
2011 Ohio 3380 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Veney
897 N.E.2d 621 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
State v. Hopings, L-07-1357 (3-7-2008)
2008 Ohio 973 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Scheib v. Summit Cty. Child Support Enforcement Agency
872 N.E.2d 954 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Thompkins, 07ap-74 (8-23-2007)
2007 Ohio 4315 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)