State v. Velasco
This text of 714 A.2d 3 (State v. Velasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 424 (AC 16466), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had incorrectly suppressed evidence in this case under the totality of circumstances test as articulated in State v. Barton, 219 Conn. 529 (1991)?”
PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
714 A.2d 3, 244 Conn. 905, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-velasco-conn-1998.