State v. Vega
This text of 2026 Ohio 711 (State v. Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Vega, 2026-Ohio-711.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2025-L-136
Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas
MICHAEL A. VEGA, Trial Court No. 2024 CR 000850 Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
Decided: March 2, 2026 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Michael A. Vega, pro se, 1475 Chapel Road, Jefferson, OH 44047 (Defendant- Appellant).
JOHN J. EKLUND, J.
{¶1} On November 17, 2025, appellant, Michael A. Vega, filed a pro se notice of
appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas’ October 15, 2025 judgment entry
of sentence.
{¶2} “[A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry
shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R.
4(A)(1).
{¶3} App.R. 5(A)(1) states: {¶4} “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the
filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave
of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:
{¶5} “(a) Criminal proceedings . . .”
{¶6} App.R. 5(A)(2) further provides that “[a] motion for leave to appeal shall be
filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant
to perfect an appeal as of right.”
{¶7} A timely notice of appeal from the October 15, 2025 entry was due no later
than November 14, 2025, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely
by three days.
{¶8} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R.
4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without
jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal
appeal under App.R. 5(A).
{¶9} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.
EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,
SCOTT LYNCH, J.,
concur.
PAGE 2 OF 3
Case No. 2025-L-136 JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.
Any pending motions are hereby overruled as moot.
Costs shall be taxed against appellant.
JUDGE JOHN J. EKLUND
JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI, concurs
JUDGE SCOTT LYNCH, concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PAGE 3 OF 3
Case No. 2025-L-136
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2026 Ohio 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vega-ohioctapp-2026.