State v. Vega

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Vega

540 S.W.3d 510

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 2018

DocketWD 80413

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 510 (State v. Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vega, 540 S.W.3d 510 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Leonard Vega appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction for first-degree drug trafficking under § 195.222, for which he was sentenced as a prior offender to fourteen years' imprisonment. Vega raises one claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence that he assaulted and threatened a witness in his case because, he claims, this evidence constituted improper propensity evidence and violated his right to be tried for only the crime charged. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Leonard Vega appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction for first-degree drug trafficking under § 195.222, for which he was sentenced as a prior offender to fourteen years' imprisonment. Vega raises one claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence that he assaulted and threatened a witness in his case because, he claims, this evidence constituted improper propensity evidence and violated his right to be tried for only the crime charged. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vega-moctapp-2018.