State v. Veal

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Veal

559 So. 2d 1383, 1990 La. LEXIS 1069, 1990 WL 54579

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 27, 1990

DocketNo. 88-KH-3134

StatusPublished

This text of 559 So. 2d 1383 (State v. Veal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Veal, 559 So. 2d 1383, 1990 La. LEXIS 1069, 1990 WL 54579 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Veal, Alvin; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 272-486.

[1384]*1384Granted in part; denied m part. The trial court’s judgment of December 6, 1988, denying petitioner relief in case number 272-486, is amended to allow for review of future applications for post-conviction relief filed by this petitioner. Applications for post-conviction relief must be considered individually. While the law provides for dismissal upon the pleadings, La. C.Cr.P. art. 928, summary disposition, La. C.Cr.P. art. 929, disposition based upon an evidentiary hearing, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930, and dismissal based on repetitiveness, La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4, it does not allow for prospective denial of applications not yet filed. In all other respects, the petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Veal, Alvin; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 272-486.

[1384]*1384Granted in part; denied m part. The trial court’s judgment of December 6, 1988, denying petitioner relief in case number 272-486, is amended to allow for review of future applications for post-conviction relief filed by this petitioner. Applications for post-conviction relief must be considered individually. While the law provides for dismissal upon the pleadings, La. C.Cr.P. art. 928, summary disposition, La. C.Cr.P. art. 929, disposition based upon an evidentiary hearing, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930, and dismissal based on repetitiveness, La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4, it does not allow for prospective denial of applications not yet filed. In all other respects, the petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 1383, 1990 La. LEXIS 1069, 1990 WL 54579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-veal-la-1990.