State v. Vaught

242 S.W.3d 734, 2007 WL 3070796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Vaught. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1455
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2007·No. WD 67220·Published

Opinion

242 S.W.3d 734 (2007)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Danny P. VAUGHT, Appellant.

No. WD 67220.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

October 23, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied December 18, 2007.
Application for Transfer to Denied January 22, 2008.

*735 Clifford W. Cornell, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO for Respondent.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., PAUL M. SPINDEN, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 18, 2007.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Danny P. Vaught appeals his conviction of tampering with physical evidence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vaught, 242 S.W.3d 734, 2007 WL 3070796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

242 S.W.3d 734 (State v. Vaught) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vaught
242 S.W.3d 734 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)