State v. Vaught
242 S.W.3d 734, 2007 WL 3070796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Vaught. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1455 →
Opinion
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Danny P. VAUGHT, Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
*735 Clifford W. Cornell, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., PAUL M. SPINDEN, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 18, 2007.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Danny P. Vaught appeals his conviction of tampering with physical evidence.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Vaught, 242 S.W.3d 734, 2007 WL 3070796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
242 S.W.3d 734 (State v. Vaught) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vaught
242 S.W.3d 734 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)