State v. Vaughn

16 S.C.L. 313
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 S.C.L. 313 (State v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vaughn, 16 S.C.L. 313 (S.C. 1824).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Huger.

Formerly, seals appear to have been regarded with more respect than they are at present. 'When the art of writing was confined to a few, seals were used to designate persons; but now that writing has become common, the person is identified by the hand writing, and seals are seldom used but to give character to the instrument. There appears to be no reason why the official act of a magistrate should be under seal, as it derives its character from the law which prescribes it. Should a statute prescribe a seal, it must be followed; but where no such re- uisite is prescribed, it is unnecessary: (1 hitty, Crim. Law 38.) The motion therefore must be dismissed.

JVott, Johnson, Gantt, Richardson, Justice concurred»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Covert
675 S.E.2d 740 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.C.L. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vaughn-sc-1824.