State v. Vaughn Phipps

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 12, 2024
DocketA24A0686
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Vaughn Phipps (State v. Vaughn Phipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vaughn Phipps, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., GOBEIL and PIPKIN, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

August 12, 2024

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A24A0686. THE STATE v. PHIPPS.

GOBEIL, Judge.

In this appeal, the State challenges the State Court of Fulton County’s order

dismissing the misdemeanor accusation charging Vaughn Phipps with DUI less safe

(alcohol) based on the expiration of the applicable statute of limitation. Specifically,

the State argues that the trial court miscalculated the tolling period for criminal

prosecutions stemming from the Supreme Court of Georgia’s judicial emergency

orders issued during the COVID-19 pandemic.1 As explained below, we agree and

reverse.

1 The judicial emergency orders may be viewed at the Supreme Court of Georgia’s website, www.gasupreme.us. On March 7, 2020, Phipps was arrested after he allegedly drove on a sidewalk

in Atlanta. More than two years after the incident, on March 4, 2023, the State filed

an accusation charging Phipps with DUI less safe (alcohol). In the accusation, the

State, referencing the Supreme Court’s tolling orders, noted that the two-year statute

of limitation for misdemeanor prosecutions (see OCGA § 17-1-3 (e) (“Prosecution for

misdemeanor crimes shall be commenced within two years after the commission of the

crime.”)) excluded “the dates beginning March 14, 2020, and ending June 30,

2021[.]”

When the case was called for trial in October 2023, Phipps requested a

continuance. The trial court denied the request, and, in the same order, dismissed the

case. Specifically, the trial court referenced the guidance provided by our Supreme

Court’s July 10, 2020 Fourth Order Extending Declaration of Statewide Judicial

Emergency (the “Fourth Order”), and concluded that “[t]he total time that statutes

of limitation in misdemeanor cases was tolled is [o]ne [h]undred [t]wenty [t]wo (122)

days.” Thus, the court concluded that the State was required to bring charges against

Phipps no later than July 7, 2022, and its failure to do so required dismissal of the

accusation. The State then filed a notice of appeal.

2 In its sole claim of error, the State argues that the trial court erred in its

calculation of the tolling period applicable to misdemeanor criminal prosecutions.2

“We review legal errors with respect to statute of limitation issues de novo.”

State v. Jones, __ Ga. App. __, __ (Case No. A24A0558, decided May 23, 2024).

Subsequent to Phipps’s March 7, 2020 arrest, on March 14, 2020, the Supreme

Court of Georgia issued an order declaring a statewide judicial emergency in response

to the COVID-19 pandemic. The judicial emergency order provided in pertinent part

that

during the period of this Order, the [Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia] hereby suspends, tolls, extends, and otherwise grants relief from any deadlines or other time schedules or filing requirements imposed by otherwise applicable statutes, rules, regulations, or court orders, whether in civil or criminal cases or administrative matters, including, but not limited to any: (1) statute of limitation . . . .

The emergency order was subsequently extended several times. On July 10, 2020, our

Supreme Court issued the Fourth Order, which reimposed (effective July 14, 2020)

most deadlines and other time schedules and filing requirements that had been

suspended or tolled by the March 14, 2020 order, with certain exceptions. The Fourth

2 Phipps did not file an appellee’s brief in connection with this appeal. 3 Order noted that “[t]he 122 days between March 14 and July 14, 2020, or any portion

of that period in which a statute of limitation would have run, shall be excluded from

the calculation of that statute of limitation.” Notably, however, the Fourth Order

stated that “[u]ntil grand jury proceedings are generally authorized, statutes of

limitation in criminal cases shall also remain tolled.” The Supreme Court extended

the judicial emergency numerous times, and in its fifteenth extension, noted that the

judicial emergency would end as of June 30, 2021.

“Accordingly, although the statute of limitation for misdemeanor offenses is

generally two years, . . . the COVID-19 Emergency Orders tolled the statute of

limitation in criminal cases from March 14, 2020, until June 30, 2021.” Jones, __ Ga.

App. at __. In this case, because the two-year statute of limitation in Phipps’s case did

not expire until after the State filed the accusation against him on March 4, 2023, the

trial court erred in dismissing the case against him.

Judgment reversed. Barnes, P. J., and Pipkin, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 17-1-3
Georgia § 17-1-3(e)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Vaughn Phipps, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vaughn-phipps-gactapp-2024.