State v. Vaughn Phipps
This text of State v. Vaughn Phipps (State v. Vaughn Phipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., GOBEIL and PIPKIN, JJ.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
August 12, 2024
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A24A0686. THE STATE v. PHIPPS.
GOBEIL, Judge.
In this appeal, the State challenges the State Court of Fulton County’s order
dismissing the misdemeanor accusation charging Vaughn Phipps with DUI less safe
(alcohol) based on the expiration of the applicable statute of limitation. Specifically,
the State argues that the trial court miscalculated the tolling period for criminal
prosecutions stemming from the Supreme Court of Georgia’s judicial emergency
orders issued during the COVID-19 pandemic.1 As explained below, we agree and
reverse.
1 The judicial emergency orders may be viewed at the Supreme Court of Georgia’s website, www.gasupreme.us. On March 7, 2020, Phipps was arrested after he allegedly drove on a sidewalk
in Atlanta. More than two years after the incident, on March 4, 2023, the State filed
an accusation charging Phipps with DUI less safe (alcohol). In the accusation, the
State, referencing the Supreme Court’s tolling orders, noted that the two-year statute
of limitation for misdemeanor prosecutions (see OCGA § 17-1-3 (e) (“Prosecution for
misdemeanor crimes shall be commenced within two years after the commission of the
crime.”)) excluded “the dates beginning March 14, 2020, and ending June 30,
2021[.]”
When the case was called for trial in October 2023, Phipps requested a
continuance. The trial court denied the request, and, in the same order, dismissed the
case. Specifically, the trial court referenced the guidance provided by our Supreme
Court’s July 10, 2020 Fourth Order Extending Declaration of Statewide Judicial
Emergency (the “Fourth Order”), and concluded that “[t]he total time that statutes
of limitation in misdemeanor cases was tolled is [o]ne [h]undred [t]wenty [t]wo (122)
days.” Thus, the court concluded that the State was required to bring charges against
Phipps no later than July 7, 2022, and its failure to do so required dismissal of the
accusation. The State then filed a notice of appeal.
2 In its sole claim of error, the State argues that the trial court erred in its
calculation of the tolling period applicable to misdemeanor criminal prosecutions.2
“We review legal errors with respect to statute of limitation issues de novo.”
State v. Jones, __ Ga. App. __, __ (Case No. A24A0558, decided May 23, 2024).
Subsequent to Phipps’s March 7, 2020 arrest, on March 14, 2020, the Supreme
Court of Georgia issued an order declaring a statewide judicial emergency in response
to the COVID-19 pandemic. The judicial emergency order provided in pertinent part
that
during the period of this Order, the [Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia] hereby suspends, tolls, extends, and otherwise grants relief from any deadlines or other time schedules or filing requirements imposed by otherwise applicable statutes, rules, regulations, or court orders, whether in civil or criminal cases or administrative matters, including, but not limited to any: (1) statute of limitation . . . .
The emergency order was subsequently extended several times. On July 10, 2020, our
Supreme Court issued the Fourth Order, which reimposed (effective July 14, 2020)
most deadlines and other time schedules and filing requirements that had been
suspended or tolled by the March 14, 2020 order, with certain exceptions. The Fourth
2 Phipps did not file an appellee’s brief in connection with this appeal. 3 Order noted that “[t]he 122 days between March 14 and July 14, 2020, or any portion
of that period in which a statute of limitation would have run, shall be excluded from
the calculation of that statute of limitation.” Notably, however, the Fourth Order
stated that “[u]ntil grand jury proceedings are generally authorized, statutes of
limitation in criminal cases shall also remain tolled.” The Supreme Court extended
the judicial emergency numerous times, and in its fifteenth extension, noted that the
judicial emergency would end as of June 30, 2021.
“Accordingly, although the statute of limitation for misdemeanor offenses is
generally two years, . . . the COVID-19 Emergency Orders tolled the statute of
limitation in criminal cases from March 14, 2020, until June 30, 2021.” Jones, __ Ga.
App. at __. In this case, because the two-year statute of limitation in Phipps’s case did
not expire until after the State filed the accusation against him on March 4, 2023, the
trial court erred in dismissing the case against him.
Judgment reversed. Barnes, P. J., and Pipkin, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Vaughn Phipps, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vaughn-phipps-gactapp-2024.