State v. Vaughn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Vaughn

523 S.W.3d 610, 2017 WL 3254467, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 745

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 1, 2017·No. ED 104092·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Vaughn (“Defendant”) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree murder, one count of second-degree murder, and two attendant counts of armed criminal action. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, ■ setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Vaughn (“Defendant”) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree murder, one count of second-degree murder, and two attendant counts of armed criminal action. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, ■ setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Vaughn, 523 S.W.3d 610, 2017 WL 3254467, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 745 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

523 S.W.3d 610 (State v. Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related