State v. Vaughn

229 S.W.3d 643, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 2007 WL 2176119
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Vaughn. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1713
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 2007·No. WD 66451·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first-degree murder, pursuant to Section 565.020, 1 and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015, RSMo (2000), for the shooting death of his -wife. He does not dispute that he killed his wife but argues that he lacked criminal responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect. Defendant requests plain error review of his claims that the trial court erred in admitting testimony about certain statements he made to the police as to defendant’s invocation of his right to remain silent. This court determined that defendant waived the right to remain silent prior to speaking with the police and the defendant’s statement that he should “probably talk to somebody” was insufficient to re-invoke defendant’s right to remain silent. Judgment affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vaughn, 229 S.W.3d 643, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 2007 WL 2176119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

229 S.W.3d 643 (State v. Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koenig Law Firm, L.L.C. v. James A. Rahm, L.L.C.
229 S.W.3d 643 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)