Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Vasquez

State v. Vasquez

2004 Ohio 7016, 820 N.E.2d 370, 104 Ohio St. 3d 507
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 29, 2004
Docket2004-1456
StatusPublished

This text of 2004 Ohio 7016 (State v. Vasquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vasquez, 2004 Ohio 7016, 820 N.E.2d 370, 104 Ohio St. 3d 507 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. 5.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. *508 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura M. Rayce, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and David L. Strait, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
103 Ohio St. 3d 580 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 Ohio 7016, 820 N.E.2d 370, 104 Ohio St. 3d 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vasquez-ohio-2004.