State v. Vasquez

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Vasquez

2004 Ohio 7016, 820 N.E.2d 370, 104 Ohio St. 3d 507

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 2004·No. 2004-1456·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. 5.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. *508 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura M. Rayce, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and David L. Strait, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. 5.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. *508 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura M. Rayce, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and David L. Strait, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

State v. Vasquez, 2004 Ohio 7016, 820 N.E.2d 370, 104 Ohio St. 3d 507 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

2004 Ohio 7016 (State v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related