State v. Vasel

190 A.2d 74, 24 Conn. Super. Ct. 319, 24 Conn. Supp. 319, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 573, 1963 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 195
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 28, 1963·No. File No. MV 16-3886·Published

Opinion

The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes § 14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence. *Page 320

There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Rule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Rule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

There is no error.

KINMONTH, DEARINGTON and JACOBS, JS., participated in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vasel, 190 A.2d 74, 24 Conn. Super. Ct. 319, 24 Conn. Supp. 319, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 573, 1963 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 195 (Colo. Ct. App. 1963).

190 A.2d 74 (State v. Vasel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.