State v. Vasco

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Vasco

195 A.3d 839, 235 N.J. 365

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 30, 2018·No. A-54 September Term 2017; 080426·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

**365The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Espinosa's dissenting opinion, reported at **366--- N.J. Super. ----, ----, --- A.3d ----, 2017 WL 10445742 (App. Div. 2017) (Espinosa, J.A.D., dissenting). Defendant's guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

**365The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Espinosa's dissenting opinion, reported at **366--- N.J. Super. ----, ----, --- A.3d ----, 2017 WL 10445742 (App. Div. 2017) (Espinosa, J.A.D., dissenting). Defendant's guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

State v. Vasco, 195 A.3d 839, 235 N.J. 365 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

195 A.3d 839 (State v. Vasco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related