State v. Vasco

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Vasco

195 A.3d 839, 235 N.J. 365

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 30, 2018

DocketA-54 September Term 2017; 080426

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 195 A.3d 839 (State v. Vasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vasco, 195 A.3d 839, 235 N.J. 365 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

**365The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Espinosa's dissenting opinion, reported at **366--- N.J. Super. ----, ----, --- A.3d ----, 2017 WL 10445742 (App. Div. 2017) (Espinosa, J.A.D., dissenting). Defendant's guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

**365The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Espinosa's dissenting opinion, reported at **366--- N.J. Super. ----, ----, --- A.3d ----, 2017 WL 10445742 (App. Div. 2017) (Espinosa, J.A.D., dissenting). Defendant's guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.3d 839, 235 N.J. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vasco-nj-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack