State v. Varszegi
659 A.2d 184, 233 Conn. 912, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 180
This text of 659 A.2d 184 (State v. Varszegi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Varszegi, 659 A.2d 184, 233 Conn. 912, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 180 (Colo. 1995).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 680 (AC 12599), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Was the defendant deprived of a constitutional right when he was impeached at trial by evidence of a prior conviction that was subsequently reversed on the ground of insufficient evidence?
“2. If there was such a deprivation, was the error harmless?
“3. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that an objective test is employed in determining whether the defendant was entitled to have submitted to the jury the defense of necessity?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15219.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Varszegi
673 A.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
659 A.2d 184, 233 Conn. 912, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-varszegi-conn-1995.