State v. Varrecchio

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Varrecchio

430 So. 2d 655, 1983 La. LEXIS 10565

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 15, 1983

DocketNo. 82-KA-2177

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 430 So. 2d 655 (State v. Varrecchio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Varrecchio, 430 So. 2d 655, 1983 La. LEXIS 10565 (La. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ivas charged by bill of information with simple burglary in violation of La.R.S. 14:62. After trial by jury beginning on August 25, 1981, he was found guilty as charged. The state then filed an information against him under the multiple offender provisions of La.R.S. 15:529.1. On October 26, 1981, the trial court sentenced defendant as a second offender to a maximum term of twenty-four (24) years’ imprisonment at hard labor. He has now appealed his conviction and sentence to this Court on the basis of two assignments of error.

We have reviewed defendant’s assignment relating to the jury’s verdict and find it without merit. His conviction is therefore affirmed. However, we find that defendant’s commission of the present offense while on probation does not a lone support the trial court’s conclusion that “[t]here’s only one remedy for [this] situation ... the longest confinement possible under the law.” Cf., La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.1(C); State v. Telsee, 425 So.2d 1251 (La.1983); State v. Jones, 398 So.2d 1049 (La.1981). Accordingly, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accord with the guidelines provided by Art. 894.1.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE RE-/ MANDED. '

LEMMON, J., concurs for the failure to comply with C.Cr.P. 894.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ivas charged by bill of information with simple burglary in violation of La.R.S. 14:62. After trial by jury beginning on August 25, 1981, he was found guilty as charged. The state then filed an information against him under the multiple offender provisions of La.R.S. 15:529.1. On October 26, 1981, the trial court sentenced defendant as a second offender to a maximum term of twenty-four (24) years’ imprisonment at hard labor. He has now appealed his conviction and sentence to this Court on the basis of two assignments of error.

We have reviewed defendant’s assignment relating to the jury’s verdict and find it without merit. His conviction is therefore affirmed. However, we find that defendant’s commission of the present offense while on probation does not a lone support the trial court’s conclusion that “[t]here’s only one remedy for [this] situation ... the longest confinement possible under the law.” Cf., La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.1(C); State v. Telsee, 425 So.2d 1251 (La.1983); State v. Jones, 398 So.2d 1049 (La.1981). Accordingly, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accord with the guidelines provided by Art. 894.1.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE RE-/ MANDED. '

LEMMON, J., concurs for the failure to comply with C.Cr.P. 894.1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

430 So. 2d 655, 1983 La. LEXIS 10565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-varrecchio-la-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack