State v. Varn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Varn

279 S.W.3d 239, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 390, 2009 WL 764880

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 2009·No. ED 90381·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Varn appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of driving while intoxicated. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Varn appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of driving while intoxicated. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Varn, 279 S.W.3d 239, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 390, 2009 WL 764880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

279 S.W.3d 239 (State v. Varn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.