Home/Supreme Court of Florida/State v. Variance

State v. Variance

686 So. 2d 573, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 35, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 1996 WL 734806
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 26, 1996
DocketNo. 87916
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 573 (State v. Variance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Variance, 686 So. 2d 573, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 35, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 1996 WL 734806 (Fla. 1996).

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Variance v. State, 687 So.2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), on motion for certification, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1052 (Fla. 4th DCA May 1, 1996), wherein the district court certified two questions.1 We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We [574]*574quash Variance, based on State v. Wilson, 686 So.2d 569 (Fla.1996), wherein we held that the giving of a nearly identical instruction did not constitute fundamental error and required a contemporaneous objection to be preserved for review.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wilson
686 So. 2d 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Variance v. State
687 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 573, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 35, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 1996 WL 734806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-variance-fla-1996.