State v. Vargas

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 2011·No. 30,425·Unpublished

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9 v. No. 30,425 10 ANNIE VARGAS, 11 Defendant-Appellee.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY 13 Grant L. Foutz, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellant

17 Steven F. Seeger 18 Gallup, NM

19 Advocate Law Center, P.A. 20 Bobbie P. Franklin 21 Gallup, NM

22 for Appellee 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION 24 SUTIN, Judge.

1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 REVERSED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ 10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

11 _________________________________ 12 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vargas, (N.M. Ct. App. 2011).

State v. Vargas (State v. Vargas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.