State v. Vansant

447 S.E.2d 348, 214 Ga. App. 127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Vansant. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 Ga. App. 772
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1994·No. A93A0322·Published

Opinion

Beasley, Presiding Judge.

On certiorari, the Supreme Court has reversed our holding in Division 1 of State v. Vansant, 208 Ga. App. 772 (431 SE2d 708) (1993), which was that the superior court erred in granting Vansant’s motion to suppress. See Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319 (2) (443 SE2d 474) (1994). However, the Supreme Court has affirmed our holding in Division 2 that the trial court erred in entering a judgment of acquittal after granting the motion to suppress. Id. at (3). Accordingly, our decision is vacated with respect to Division 1 and the judgment, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

McMurray, P. J., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R. Banke concur. [128] Decided July 26, 1994. Britt R. Priddy, District Attorney, B. Martin First, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. Richard L. Hodge, Vansant, Corriere, McClure & Dasher, K. Alan Dasher, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vansant, 447 S.E.2d 348, 214 Ga. App. 127 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

447 S.E.2d 348 (State v. Vansant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vansant v. State
443 S.E.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
State v. Vansant
431 S.E.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)