State v. Vannostrand

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Vannostrand

825 P.2d 295, 111 Or. App. 637, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 394

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 26, 1992

DocketC90-02-31217; CA A68277

StatusPublished

This text of 825 P.2d 295 (State v. Vannostrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vannostrand, 825 P.2d 295, 111 Or. App. 637, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 394 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance under a plea agreement. He was placed on 60 months’ probation, instead of the sentencing guidelines’ 18-month presumptive probation term that was agreed to in the plea agreement.

Defendant assigns as error that the court imposed an erroneous period of probation. The state concedes that he is correct. We accept the concession. State v. Adams, 110 Or App 434, 823 P2d 992 (1992).

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance under a plea agreement. He was placed on 60 months’ probation, instead of the sentencing guidelines’ 18-month presumptive probation term that was agreed to in the plea agreement.

Defendant assigns as error that the court imposed an erroneous period of probation. The state concedes that he is correct. We accept the concession. State v. Adams, 110 Or App 434, 823 P2d 992 (1992).

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

825 P.2d 295, 111 Or. App. 637, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vannostrand-orctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack