State v. Vanloan
8 Ind. 182
Opinion
Information against Vanloan and Smith [183] for an affray. On motion of Smith the information was correctly quashed. It states that the deféndants fought in a public place, but whom or what they fought is not stated. An information must contain all the substantial requisites of an indictment at common law. The State v. Miles, 4 Ind. R. 577.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Vanloan, 8 Ind. 182 (Ind. 1856).
8 Ind. 182 (State v. Vanloan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sutton v. State
188 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)