State v. Vangstad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Vangstad

289 N.W.2d 468, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1748

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 16, 1979

Docket50541

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 N.W.2d 468 (State v. Vangstad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vangstad, 289 N.W.2d 468, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1748 (Mich. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court granting a motion by defendant to suppress two statements made by defendant. The district court ruled that the state had failed to meet its burden of proving the first statement was voluntary or the second statement free from the taint of the earlier statement. North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 99 S.Ct. 1755, 60 L.Ed.2d 286 , (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); State v. Sickels, 275 N.W.2d 809 (Minn.1979); State v. Linder, 268 N.W.2d 734 (Minn.1978). Holding that the state on appeal has not met its burden of demonstrating error, we affirm. State v. Weber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court granting a motion by defendant to suppress two statements made by defendant. The district court ruled that the state had failed to meet its burden of proving the first statement was voluntary or the second statement free from the taint of the earlier statement. North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 99 S.Ct. 1755, 60 L.Ed.2d 286 , (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); State v. Sickels, 275 N.W.2d 809 (Minn.1979); State v. Linder, 268 N.W.2d 734 (Minn.1978). Holding that the state on appeal has not met its burden of demonstrating error, we affirm. State v. Weber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn.1977).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 N.W.2d 468, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vangstad-minn-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack