State v. Vanderveer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Vanderveer

7 N.J.L. 38

DecidedMay 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.J.L. 38 (State v. Vanderveer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vanderveer, 7 N.J.L. 38 (N.J. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion, that the case in Southard extends to surveyors; and the great reason why certio[47]*47raris of this kind could not be allowed at chambers, was, that public proceedings should not be interrupted by the allocatur of a single j udge.

Ford J.

I am satisfied that the allocatur was not within the rule laid down in Southard. How far that rule ought to be modified, is another question.

EosselIj J.

had no objection to reconsider that rule, and modify it if thought advisable.

Certiorari quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI