State v. Vanderbilt

340 S.E.2d 543, 287 S.C. 597, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 276
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 21, 1986
Docket22474
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 340 S.E.2d 543 (State v. Vanderbilt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vanderbilt, 340 S.E.2d 543, 287 S.C. 597, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 276 (S.C. 1986).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*598 Appellant was found guilty of distributing one gram of cocaine to an undercover officer. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. We affirm.

Most of the issues raised by the appellant are not properly before this Court because no objections were made at trial. Even though no contemporaneous and proper objections were taken at trial, appellant argues that this Court should review his arguments as a “matter of grace.” For this proposition, appellant relies on State v. Griffin, 129 S. C. 200, 124 S. E. 81 (1924). In Griffin, the Court stated that this Court is bound to take notice of any error apparent in the record by which the appellant has been deprived of any substantial means of enjoying a fair and impartial trial.

Numerous decisions of this Court have impliedly overruled Griffin. See State v. Newton, 274 S. C. 287, 262 S. E. (2d) 906 (1980); Miller v. State, 269 S. C. 113, 236 S. E. (2d) 422 (1977); State v. Sachs, 264 S. C. 541, 216 S. E. (2d) 501 (1975). The doctrine of in favorem vitae, which applies in death penalty cases, is the only exception to this rule. See generally State v. Adams, 279 S. C. 228, 306 S. E. (2d) 208 (1983); State v. Goolsby, 275 S. C. 110, 268 S. E. (2d) 31, cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1037, 101 S. Ct. 616, 66 L. Ed. (2d) 500 (1980).

Issues not properly preserved at trial may not be raised for the first time on appeal. To the extent that State v. Griffin, supra, may be inconsistent with this result it is overruled.

The remaining exceptions are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Christopher Wells
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2017
State v. Simmons
682 S.E.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009)
State v. Bradley
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009
State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2007
State v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2006
State v. Luckabaugh
489 S.E.2d 657 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1997)
Jackson v. Speed
486 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1997)
State v. Watts
467 S.E.2d 272 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1996)
State v. Black
462 S.E.2d 311 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1995)
State v. Hoffman
440 S.E.2d 869 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)
Wolf v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance
420 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
State v. Williams
401 S.E.2d 168 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)
State v. Nathari
399 S.E.2d 597 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1990)
State v. Woodruff
387 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1989)
State v. Childs
385 S.E.2d 839 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1989)
State v. Johnson
381 S.E.2d 732 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1989)
State v. Parker
366 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1988)
State v. Lewis
359 S.E.2d 66 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1987)
Jones v. State
517 So. 2d 1295 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Beachum
342 S.E.2d 597 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 S.E.2d 543, 287 S.C. 597, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vanderbilt-sc-1986.