State v. Vandenburg

60 S.W. 1134, 160 Mo. 42, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedFebruary 12, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 60 S.W. 1134 (State v. Vandenburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vandenburg, 60 S.W. 1134, 160 Mo. 42, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 36 (Mo. 1901).

Opinion

SHERWOOD, P. J.

The defendant, alias John Burg, was indicted for obtaining a check for $10 from one Martin B. Rafter, on the Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of Troy, Mo., and also for obtaining from the same party a promissory note for $30; which check and which note were alleged to have been obtained by defendant through and by means of false pretenses.

Defendant’s motion to quash the indictment proved successful, and the State appealed, the sufficiency of the indictment being the only question the record presents.

This case is on all fours with that of the State against the same defendant, decided at the present term, 159 Mo. 230, wherein it was ruled that an indictment, substantially identical with the one at bar, was not obnoxious to objection. That case dominates this one, and for like reasons the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vandenburg
60 S.W. 79 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.W. 1134, 160 Mo. 42, 1901 Mo. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vandenburg-mo-1901.