State v. Vance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Vance

551 So. 2d 1317, 1989 La. LEXIS 2633, 1989 WL 136480

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 10, 1989

DocketNo. 89-K-1614

StatusPublished

This text of 551 So. 2d 1317 (State v. Vance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vance, 551 So. 2d 1317, 1989 La. LEXIS 2633, 1989 WL 136480 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Vance, Hury; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20454-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 136860.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 41.

[1318]*1318Denied. It was clearly erroneous for the trial court not to permit defense counsel to make objections during oral argument. In this case, however, the error was harmless.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Vance, Hury; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20454-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 136860.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 41.

[1318]*1318Denied. It was clearly erroneous for the trial court not to permit defense counsel to make objections during oral argument. In this case, however, the error was harmless.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 So. 2d 1317, 1989 La. LEXIS 2633, 1989 WL 136480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vance-la-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack