State v. Vance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Vance

551 So. 2d 1317, 1989 La. LEXIS 2633, 1989 WL 136480

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 10, 1989·No. No. 89-K-1614·Published

Opinion

In re Vance, Hury; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20454-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 136860.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 41.

[1318] Denied. It was clearly erroneous for the trial court not to permit defense counsel to make objections during oral argument. In this case, however, the error was harmless.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Vance, Hury; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20454-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 136860.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 41.

[1318] Denied. It was clearly erroneous for the trial court not to permit defense counsel to make objections during oral argument. In this case, however, the error was harmless.

State v. Vance, 551 So. 2d 1317, 1989 La. LEXIS 2633, 1989 WL 136480 (La. 1989).

Pincite

551 So. 2d 1317 (State v. Vance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related