State v. Vance

218 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 1967413, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6821
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the information and remand this cause for further proceedings. See Poillot v. State, 200 So.3d 743 (Fla. 2016) (holding that participation in Work Release Program is still confinement such that deviation from Work Release Program established prima facie case of escape under section 944.40, Florida Statutes (2014)); Early v. State, 678 So.2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (holding that defendant’s failure to return to Work Release Facility as ordered constituted escape under section 944.40, Florida Statutes (1995)). Appellee’s alternative argument that his confinement was “invalid” was not preserved for review by this court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., and ' JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vance, 218 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 1967413, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6821 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

218 So. 3d 499 (State v. Vance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Early v. State
678 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Claudio J. Poillot v. State of Florida
200 So. 3d 743 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)