State v. Van Winkle

699 So. 2d 77, 1997 La. LEXIS 2520, 1997 WL 563216
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 5, 1997
DocketNo. 97-KH-2147
StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 77 (State v. Van Winkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Van Winkle, 699 So. 2d 77, 1997 La. LEXIS 2520, 1997 WL 563216 (La. 1997).

Opinion

In re Van Winkle, Patricia; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial wilts; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “O”, No. 91-3400.

Writ granted. The court of appeal is ordered to accept and consider relator’s pro se filing. State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La. 9/22/95), 660 So.2d 466 (“the meaningful access to courts guaranteed by La. Const. art. I, Sections 2, 19 and 22 requires courts to accept and consider post-verdict pro se filings”); see also State v. Schexnayder, 96-0098, p. 24 (La.App. 5th Cir. 11/26/96), 685 So.2d 357, 371.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Schexnayder
685 So. 2d 357 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. Melon
660 So. 2d 466 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 77, 1997 La. LEXIS 2520, 1997 WL 563216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-van-winkle-la-1997.