State v. VAN TRUSELL

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. VAN TRUSELL

524 S.E.2d 804, 351 N.C. 347, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 132

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 3, 2000

Docket324A99

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 524 S.E.2d 804 (State v. VAN TRUSELL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. VAN TRUSELL, 524 S.E.2d 804, 351 N.C. 347, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 132 (N.C. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion of Judge Greene, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in that dissent and remand to that court for further remand to the Superior Court, Lee County, for proceedings consistent with the dissent below. We conclude the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion of Judge Greene, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in that dissent and remand to that court for further remand to the Superior Court, Lee County, for proceedings consistent with the dissent below. We conclude the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

524 S.E.2d 804, 351 N.C. 347, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-van-trusell-nc-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack