Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/State v. Van Natta

State v. Van Natta

811 S.W.2d 608, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, 1991 WL 117451
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 3, 1991
DocketNo. 532-91
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 811 S.W.2d 608 (State v. Van Natta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Van Natta, 811 S.W.2d 608, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, 1991 WL 117451 (Tex. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellee was arrested and charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated. After a pretrial hearing, the trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Van Natta, 805 S.W.2d 40 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth, 1991).

The State raises five grounds for review. As is true in every case where discretion[609]*609ary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse the State’s petition for discretionary review.

McCORMICK, P.J., and BAIRD, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Skiles
870 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
State v. Holt
852 S.W.2d 47 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
State v. Hubacek
840 S.W.2d 751 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
811 S.W.2d 608, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, 1991 WL 117451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-van-natta-texcrimapp-1991.