State v. Van Kell
This text of 2021 Ohio 109 (State v. Van Kell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Van Kell, 2021-Ohio-109.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2020-L-126 - vs - :
JAMES M. VAN KELL, :
Defendant-Appellant. :
Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2018 CR 000672.
Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
James M. Van Kell, pro se, PID# A770-631, Trumbull Correctional Institution, 5701 Burnett Road, P.O. Box 640, Leavittsburg, OH 44430 (Defendant-Appellant).
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.
{¶1} On December 21, 2020, appellant, James M. Van Kell, pro se, filed a
notice of appeal from the trial court’s November 14, 2019 sentencing entry, which he
attached to his notice. A timely notice was due no later than December 16, 2019, which
was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely by over a year.
{¶2} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its
entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.”
App.R. 4(A)(1). {¶3} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for
the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with
leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:
{¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * *
{¶5} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals
and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of
right. * * *.” App.R. 5(A).
{¶6} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R.
4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without
jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal
appeal under App.R. 5(A).
{¶7} Appeal dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.
MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J.,
MATT LYNCH, J.,
concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 Ohio 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-van-kell-ohioctapp-2021.