State v. Van Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Van Johnson

587 N.E.2d 298, 63 Ohio St. 3d 306, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 456

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1413

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 587 N.E.2d 298 (State v. Van Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Van Johnson, 587 N.E.2d 298, 63 Ohio St. 3d 306, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 456 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause is reversed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, the defendant-appellee may file for [307]*307delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Montgomery County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 67-68, 584 N.E.2d 1204, 1210. Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is reversed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, the defendant-appellee may file for [307]*307delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Montgomery County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 67-68, 584 N.E.2d 1204, 1210. Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

587 N.E.2d 298, 63 Ohio St. 3d 306, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-van-johnson-ohio-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack