State v. Van Gorder

813 P.2d 1136, 108 Or. App. 333, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1164
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 31, 1991
Docket90-CR-0015-ST; CA A66849
StatusPublished

This text of 813 P.2d 1136 (State v. Van Gorder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Van Gorder, 813 P.2d 1136, 108 Or. App. 333, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1164 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted, after his plea of guilty, of two misdemeanors. The court placed him on probation and, as one condition, sentenced him to incarceration in the county jail. Defendant contends that, because the offenses were committed after November 1,1989, the effective date of the amendment to ORS 137.540(2), the court had no authority to impose a jail sentence as a condition of probation on a misdemeanor conviction. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we agree. State v. Wold, 105 Or App 158, 803 P2d 782 (1991).

Convictions affirmed; condition of probation requiring incarceration vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wold
803 P.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
813 P.2d 1136, 108 Or. App. 333, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-van-gorder-orctapp-1991.