State v. Valdez

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 35,740

5 MANUEL VALDEZ,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 8 Fernando R. Macias, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender 13 Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender 14 Santa Fe, NM

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 VANZI, Chief Judge.

18 {1} Defendant Manuel Valdez has sought to appeal his conviction of aggravated

19 assault with a deadly weapon. We previously issued a notice of proposed summary 1 disposition in which we proposed to affirm. Defendant has filed a memorandum in

2 opposition. After due consideration, we remain unpersuaded.

3 {2} In his memorandum in opposition, Defendant presents no new arguments but

4 reiterates his position that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his

5 conviction. [MIO 2-5] We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s argument.

6 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we

7 affirm.

8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

11 WE CONCUR:

12 _________________________________ 13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

14 _________________________________ 15 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge