State v. VALAZQUEZ
This text of 600 S.E.2d 466 (State v. VALAZQUEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Marcos Antonio VALAZQUEZ.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Marcos Antonio Valazquez.
Thomas Lawton, III, Assistant Attorney General, William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everitt, for State.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 2nd day of March 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of March 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 S.E.2d 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-valazquez-nc-2004.