State v. Vaimili

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Vaimili. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 9
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided August 28, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000034·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000034 28-AUG-2013 02:13 PM

SCWC-12-0000034

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JOSEPH VAIMILI, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee,

and

FREEDOM BAIL BONDS, Petitioner/Surety-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000034; CR. NO. 09-1-0410)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on July

19, 2013 by Petitioner/Surety-Appellant Freedom Bail Bonds is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 28, 2013.

Matthew N. Padgett, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Vaimili, (haw 2013).

State v. Vaimili (State v. Vaimili) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.