State v. Vail

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Vail

848 P.2d 148, 119 Or. App. 146, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 541

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 31, 1993

Docket91CR-0190; CA A73120

StatusPublished

This text of 848 P.2d 148 (State v. Vail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vail, 848 P.2d 148, 119 Or. App. 146, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 541 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

After entering a plea of no contest, defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. The trial court sentenced him to 24 months probation with the special condition that he serve 120 custody units. The court ordered that 60 of the 120 custody units be served “as directed by * * * County Probation Department.” Although the error was not preserved, we review under ORAP 5.45. Defendant argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court lacks authority to make such a delegation to the probation department. We accept that concession. OAR 253-05-012 (3)(b); State v. Shefler, 118 Or App 536, 847 P2d 417 (1993).

Conviction affirmed; condition of probation that 60 custody units be utilized at discretion of County Probation Department vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

After entering a plea of no contest, defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. The trial court sentenced him to 24 months probation with the special condition that he serve 120 custody units. The court ordered that 60 of the 120 custody units be served “as directed by * * * County Probation Department.” Although the error was not preserved, we review under ORAP 5.45. Defendant argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court lacks authority to make such a delegation to the probation department. We accept that concession. OAR 253-05-012 (3)(b); State v. Shefler, 118 Or App 536, 847 P2d 417 (1993).

Conviction affirmed; condition of probation that 60 custody units be utilized at discretion of County Probation Department vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

848 P.2d 148, 119 Or. App. 146, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vail-orctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack