State v. Vail

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Vail

364 S.W.3d 267, 2012 WL 1337638, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 509

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2012

DocketED 96456

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 364 S.W.3d 267 (State v. Vail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vail, 364 S.W.3d 267, 2012 WL 1337638, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlando Vail (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of second-degree burglary and possession of burglar’s tools. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his request to question two members of the jury who saw him *268 shackled regarding their ability to give him a fair trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI