State v. Vacchione

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Vacchione

191 A. 776, 118 N.J.L. 179, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 283

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published

Opinion

*180 Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the Supreme Court that the commitment is in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions. We find no merit in the claim that it is not based upon a final judgment entered on the indictment returned against plaintiff in error.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*180 Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the Supreme Court that the commitment is in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions. We find no merit in the claim that it is not based upon a final judgment entered on the indictment returned against plaintiff in error.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

State v. Vacchione, 191 A. 776, 118 N.J.L. 179, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

191 A. 776 (State v. Vacchione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.