State v. Vacchione

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Vacchione

191 A. 776, 118 N.J.L. 179, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 283

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A. 776 (State v. Vacchione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vacchione, 191 A. 776, 118 N.J.L. 179, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

*180 Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the Supreme Court that the commitment is in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions. We find no merit in the claim that it is not based upon a final judgment entered on the indictment returned against plaintiff in error.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*180 Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the Supreme Court that the commitment is in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions. We find no merit in the claim that it is not based upon a final judgment entered on the indictment returned against plaintiff in error.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A. 776, 118 N.J.L. 179, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vacchione-nj-1937.