State v. V. M. S.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. V. M. S.

285 P.3d 764, 252 Or. App. 183, 2012 WL 3734375, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1055

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 29, 2012·No. 120160480; A150681·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that appellant suffered from a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and accept it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that appellant suffered from a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and accept it.

Reversed.

State v. V. M. S., 285 P.3d 764, 252 Or. App. 183, 2012 WL 3734375, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1055 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

285 P.3d 764 (State v. V. M. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related