State v. Usry

420 S.W.3d 676, 2014 WL 457910, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 97
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 4, 2014·No. No. ED 98490·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kurt D. Usry (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of attempted manufacture of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo.2000, possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202, possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of Section 195.233, and tampering with physical evidence, in violation of Section 575.100.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Usry, 420 S.W.3d 676, 2014 WL 457910, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 97 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

420 S.W.3d 676 (State v. Usry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kurt D. Usry v. State of Missouri
504 S.W.3d 815 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)