State v. Urrabazo

2021 ND 179, 965 N.W.2d 425
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 2021·No. 20210142·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FILED

IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

OCTOBER 14, 2021

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 179

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.

Jaime Nmn Urrabazo, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20210142

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Urrabazo

No. 20210142

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jaime Urrabazo appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of delivery of a controlled substance, a class B felony. On appeal, Urrabazo argues the evidence presented against him at trial was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Urrabazo, 2021 ND 179, 965 N.W.2d 425 (N.D. 2021).

2021 ND 179 (State v. Urrabazo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Urrabazo v. State
2024 ND 67 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2024)