State v. Urrabazo
This text of 2021 ND 179 (State v. Urrabazo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 179
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jaime Nmn Urrabazo, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210142
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Urrabazo No. 20210142
[¶1] Jaime Urrabazo appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of delivery of a controlled substance, a class B felony. On appeal, Urrabazo argues the evidence presented against him at trial was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 179, 965 N.W.2d 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-urrabazo-nd-2021.